Hello :-) Le 23/10/2011 20:00, Georges Racinet a écrit : >> Le 17/10/2011 19:34, Georges Racinet a écrit : >>> [...] >>> About version numbers, I am more and more convinced that 3.6 should stay >>> on Zope 2.10, support the current distribution standard (eggs + >>> buildout) plus a few nice features. > > The porting to CMF 2.1.1 is now considered done (see > http://trac.cps-cms.org/ticket/2453). In particular, the periodic test > runs now include the default branch for CPS-3-base and CPS-3 (a.k.a > Standard). >
Great great great! > Obviously there's still a bit of cleaning to be made, and some legacy > stuff (mostly related to CPSSkins) to be reorganized. > > To get back on the subject of version numbers, I'm wondering if we could > release an early 3.6.0 with just that, start the eggification with > 3.6.1, etc ? > Release Early, Release Often! :-) http://catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html > The alternative would be to tag 3.6.0 once every component in CPS-3-full > works and is available on pypi. > > Opinions ? > -- Marc-Aurèle DARCHE http://cps-cms.org/ AFUL http://aful.org/ Association Francophone des Utilisateurs de Logiciels Libres French speaking Libre Software Users' Association _______________________________________________ cps-devel mailing list http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
