On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 08:03:22PM -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote: > Declan and Jim both seemed to have missed the point about Cypherpunks. I've > attended physical meetings, off and on, since meeting #2 or #3 in the Bay > Area. It's a fair point, and I don't think I missed it. In any case, I don't mean to spark an undue amount of internecine warfare, so I'll shut up now. -Declan
- Re: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, relu... dmolnar
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpu... James A. Donald
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Tim May
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Seth Finkelstein
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpu... Bill Stewart
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cyp... James A. Donald
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cyp... James A. Donald
- RE: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherp... Declan McCullagh
- RE: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cyp... Sandy Sandfort
- RE: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... Jim Choate
- Re: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherp... Bill Stewart
- Re: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Seth Finkelstein
- Re: CDR: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? J.A. Terranson
- Re: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Declan McCullagh
- Re: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Marshall Clow
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? An Metet
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Sandy Sandfort
- Re: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Jim Choate
