That's true, alright there ya go.
[This is a sig file]
-ming the merciless
check out my page, er, my planet: www.planetmongo.net
On Wed, 16 May 2001, tidepool wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2001, ming wrote:
> >
> > But, you'll be recording (unless you break the protection) an analog
> > signal. And you'll have generational loss each copy.
> >
>
> True, if one is trying to duplicate physical CD's. Meanwhile, to have the
> audio captured to a mp3 file, you only lose a little quality the _original
> time_ it was captured. From there on out the digital copy of the analog
> sound is distributed. This is how it differs from the copying from CD ->
> tape. Think of the recorded mp3 as the original tape copy, which isn't
> lacking much quality than the CD. Then, everyone simply copies this
> original tape.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> gpg public key @ www.rudiments.net/publickey.gpg
>
