I meant to say "a" stale.

But wait, that's not all....

Tim wrote:
> Don't hire a single lawyer. As soon as even a single lawyer is hired,
> you're lost. Because it means you're thinking in terms of using the
> legal system, of striking business deals with those whose products you
> napster, and with working within the system.
>
> Not hiring a single lawyer, not even _consulting_ with a lawyer, means
> you are fully aware of how much you are relying on the laws of
> mathematics rather than the laws of men.

"I find your lack of faith disturbing." -- Darth Vader

What happens if you break the laws of mathematics? Do fractions with guns
chase you? Do you get put in a random number prison? Or, does couching a
choice of law between the "laws of men," and "the laws of mathematics" smack
of some fallacy?

Not hiring a single lawyer, not even _consulting_ (emphasis his) a lawyer,
more truly means you are a complete moron and disdain even calculated risk.
If you break the law by a significant act in that direction, you set your
own hook for co-option, especially in espionage.

I don't see a marketplace opportunity in an espionage Black Net. In
high-tempo complex event streams with changing decision-makers, shifting
goal-setting, interveners, variable resources, etc. -- the advantage to be
gained by competitors (of any sort) more truly lies elsewhere. Mere secrets
no longer offer the edge, because they offer a short half-life of
decision-relevance. Now, 3 days to 3 months, and it grows shorter. Few
competitors have decision-utility in terms of capability and readiness to
take advantage of "secrets." Most of the information you need is open
source, or can be gained by acumen with low-risk. Add in the traitor element
and the "go to jail" consideration, and it looks like a no-go to me.
(Espionage is more traditionally called treason, BTW. It's even in the
Constitution.)

But, hey, a man should feel free to make his own decisions, just like Tim
tells him to.

~~Aimee


-------
> Tim, lay off the maskirovka will ya?
>
> I'm tired of the snitch-jacket, and it's an stale narrative.
>
> Besides, imaginative bias and perceptual predispositions can be
> used to lead
> a person, or a group, to form erroneous conclusions without resorting to
> dezinformatsia.

Reply via email to