>A pseudo-internationalism that thwarts the immediate needs of the national
working >class (yes, this certainly includes Native American workers too,
Lou's tart rejoinder >notwithstanding)to keep its labor marketable at better
than a mere subsistence wage, is >not progressive at all.
*Snip*
Newsflash: Imperialism creates higher standards of living than are realistic
under socialism, unless approached and applied on a global scale.
Translated, this will mean (unless we overthrow capitalism in one gulp
worldwide) a drop in standards of living in the first world. Asking the
Imperialist country working classes to drop in consumption is the *only*
progressive answer, since it is likely the only one connected to revolution.
Macdonald
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
