[Tahir wants to stop this thread and me too. Here are just a couple of
clarifications.]
>I just meant that removing the
>imperative towards profit makes no sense within an unchanged
>system, taking the system as a whole.
Removing profits is not the same thing as removing the incentive for profit.
There is still an incentive for less losses. This has been the case from time to
time in crisis.
>And profit implies to
>me surplus value and therefore exploitation.
Profit and surplus value are different. There can be profit without surplus value
with a very authoritarian rule. And every day lots of workers get a share of
surplus value. Every day, buisnesses make losses because of overcapacity
(f.ex.) while exploitation is still there. No profit doesn't imply no surplus value.
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
