> Well, Tom, perhaps someone might not like the term "circulatory system."
After
> all, like "bourgeois state," the thing it describes could easily be called
> something else, like "the precious fluid transport system." Or the "state
> controlled by private owners of really important property and processes,"
etc.
> Objecting to terminology can sometimes gt us somewhere and sometimes it is
> pointless objection, or objection masking something else, such as a
political
> difference
The issue is more complex, as it also revolves around the witholding of
acceptation, and the issue I raised about oversimplification. However, I am
content to let it rest and to accept your implied admonishment ... as long
as *everyone's* terminology, marxist and non-marxist alike, will receive the
same respect. Deal?
> It appears that you may object to Marx's insights and stances, and by
extention
> to those of Marxists, or scientific socialists, as well.
>
Not to all of them, just some; and by extension to some those of marxists
and scientific socialists. Is that not allowed?
(I object more to the "values" terminology, since it seems no two posters,
marxist or non-marxist, can agree. <g>)
Best,
Tom
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
