In response to your question, Jon Johns, I have not "said a thing" about the
Palestinian question because I was very perplexed and ambivalent on the
subject: if I were a Jew, to a certain extent, I would support actions to
ensure the safety of my people; on the other hand, if I were a Palestinian,
to a certain extent, I would support actions to establish a Palestinian
state. Facing this dilemma, and influenced by current events, as published in
the news media (I am not privy to first-hand information), it appears to me
that the best solution for the "impasse" would be to declare Jerusalem an
"open-city" defended by armed United Nations troops and no other weapons are
allowed. Civilian authority in the Palestinian sector would be administered
by unarmed Palestinian administrators and in other sections by unarmed
Israeli administrators.
In all probability this solution will be rejected by the antagonists, but in
the interest of peace, it behooves peace-loving people to convince them to
accept this solution or some other compromise. Violence is not the answer.
JoeMosley
In a message dated 10/2/00 7:10:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Subj: [CrashList] a question
Date: 10/2/00 7:10:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daedalus)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Crash list people
You pretend to be so conscientious, but you have not said a thing about the
ongoing carnage of the Palestinians at the hands to the Zionists (not
Jews). Has you conscience crashed? Shame on you!
Jon Johns
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist