Disclaimer: Not being in America and all I don't claim to know the California 
problem very well.

Seth, 
What you are writing about isn't a deregulation creating still more benefits for the 
wealthy at the expense of the poor. If electricity was really deregulated, the prices 
that consumers and businesses must pay could be hiked in order to pay the 
electricity producers, and that would be at the expense of the poor. A bailout would 
rather be at the expense of the folks who pay lots of taxes while owning no eletricity 
producer's equity.
Also, you seem to be ignoring the problem of overconsumption. At least your article 
denies it. Why did the problem only arise this winter? Imagine PG&E and Edison 
were nationalized... Where would the cheap electricity come from? Natural gas 
(and other commodity) prices go higher not to satisfy some evil capitalist but 
because there is too much demand. Some people will have to live on without all the 
electricity they want. Currently most of these people do not live in the USA. Do you 
support that or do you think that Californians should curb their energy consumption? 
And how can this consumption be curbed if not through big price hikes? (I am not 
denying that there has been price manipulations nor that there is an insufficient 
amount of eletricity producing plants in California relative to its electricity demand 
but none of those problems will be solved by nationalization of PG&E and Edison.)

Mark, 
A key answer to OPEC lacks in your post: Making sure that most oil exporter's 
profits come back to the core countries through finance or through military 
expenses. How many barils must the Sahoudis sell to buy a US fighter airplaine?
You say a combination of measures can save California from total crash. But 
California can currently afford as much electricity as it wants as long as it is ready 
to 
pay the price. As to measures, I say a single measure can save it from all energy 
problems for the time beign: electricity price hikes for consumers and businesses. 
Those hikes can be moderated with discounts for small consumers in order not to 
hurt the poor. Americans are such a wasterful bunch that it won't be hard for them to 
consume significantly less electricity.

Nestor, 
The root of the Californian problem is not neoliberalism and plunder of the working 
classes but on the contrary measures to protect them from the higher prices that 
they should pay for electricity. That said, the situation would certainly be better if 
the 
infrastructure wasn't private but socially managed as it should be (even economists 
recognize that).
As to your suggested reading for First World folks, care to be more precise? 
Where do I start?

Julien


_______________________________________________
Crashlist website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base

Reply via email to