Concern about climate change has given fresh impetus to the alternative power
industry, says Peter Marsh
Published: January 29 2001 19:47GMT | Last Updated: January 29 2001 20:58GMT



Last autumn, Robin Batchelor, a fund manager at Merrill Lynch, toured London,
Switzerland and the Channel Islands to try to entice investors to a new fund for
high-technology companies. The timing seemed poor, given widespread disillusionment
with internet and telecommunications businesses.

Yet the fund - which will invest in companies promoting novel energy technologies
such as wind and solar power - was heavily oversubscribed, closing at #200m. "People
are realising the fantastically exciting potential of these companies," says an
animated Mr Batchelor.

Even a decade ago, alternative energy conjured up visions of idealists who wanted to
change the world and few investors were interested. But the mood has now swung
dramatically. Not only has the Californian energy crisis shown the pitfalls of
over-reliance on traditional fuels, but environmental concerns are growing over
carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel-burning power stations.

Renewed interest from politicians and consumers has given a huge boost to the 300 or
so companies (two-thirds of them unquoted) whose main business is developing
alternative energy solutions. Many have already been aided by government subsidies
intended to increase the proportion - now less than 1 per cent - of the world's
3,300GW electricity generating capacity that comes from alternative energy sources.

The European Union wants a fifth of its power to come from "renewable" sources by
2010. Some analysts believe that within 50 years half the world's electricity could
come from non-fossil-fuel schemes, including well established hydro-power schemes
but excluding nuclear energy.

A prime beneficiary of this trend has been Vestas, a Danish agricultural machinery
maker that faced bankruptcy in 1986. The following year it refocused on wind energy
and has not looked back: it has become the world's biggest maker of wind turbines,
with a share price that rose 158 per cent in the past year, giving it a market
capitalisation of $6bn. The company is being helped by the "fear and risk of climate
change", says Johannes Poulsen, its managing director.

Of the various alternative energy fields, wind power is the most mature, with
generation costs not far above conventional power stations. Global investment in
wind power systems will total $27bn between 2000 and 2005, according to Dresdner
Kleinwort Wasserstein, the investment bank. By 2020, world wind power generating
capacity could total 400GW, equivalent to 200 large power stations.

Germany, which is spending E2bn ($1.8bn) a year to promote wind energy, has emerged
as the world leader in the technology, with wind farms sprouting up around the
country and the wind-turbine business supporting an estimated 35,000 jobs. Mr
Poulsen says the costs of producing power from the wind will continue to fall,
thanks to engineering advances in components such as drives, gearboxes and
generators.

Solar power too is becoming more economically viable. The cost of generating a
single watt of electricity from a solar cell (a piece of silicon manufactured in a
similar way to microchips) has fallen from $200 in 1980 to $3.50 today, according to
Peter Aschenbrenner, vice-president for sales at Denver-based Astropower, the
world's fifth biggest maker of solar cells.

The four biggest companies in this field are all large enterprises - Germany's
Siemens, Kyocera and Sharp of Japan and the UK's BP. However, many analysts expect
"pure play" solar companies such as Astropower, Energy Conversion Devices of the US
and Atlantis of Switzerland to do most to encourage the development of solar energy.

Astropower, which is quoted on Nasdaq, turns out solar cells using similar
principles to making glass. Its shares have risen from $6 at its initial public
offering three years ago to a current quote of $37. "We are increasingly finding we
can bypass utilities by selling our systems directly to consumers," says Mr
Aschenbrenner.

Another form of energy production attracting interest is fuel cells - devices that
create electricity efficiently by mixing hydrogen (possibly from natural gas) and
oxygen from the air. While General Electric, Siemens and Alstom, the world's three
biggest makers of conventional power stations, are all keen on either developing or
selling fuel cells, the pace in this sector is again being set by smaller companies,
including Ballard of Canada and Plug Power and H-Power of the US.

Frank Gibbard, chief executive of H-Power, who has signed a contract to provide
12,000 fuel-cell systems for rural co-operatives throughout the US, concedes that
fuel cells' manufacturing costs still need to fall by half, from $2,000/kW, before
they are considered alternatives on cost grounds to conventional power sources. "I
think these cost reductions will come as companies gain experience with
manufacturing and reliability in the field. No one is quite there yet but they could
be in a year to 18 months," he says.

Most executives in "new energy" companies agree that costs will fall further. Yet
they are still eager for displays of support from large companies and governments.
The most prominent move so far from a large industrial group came last year when
ABB, the Swiss-Swedish engineering company, quit conventional power generation
projects in favour of "green" programmes such as wind power and high-efficiency
gas-driven "micro-turbines".

Jeremy Leggett, a former Greenpeace scientist who is chief executive of Solar
Century, a UK solar energy company, says government support is crucial in
encouraging adoption of alternative energy sources. He argues that the government
should give incentives to housebuilders to incorporate solar panels in new homes.
Even in cloudy Britain, these can generate a lot of energy.

As for investors, they hope the ambitions of many of the new energy companies will
be matched by reality. "Right now we are a fly compared to the big companies [in
energy]," says Frank Asbeck, chairman of Solarworld, a Bonn-based solar energy
company with sales last year of DM105m ($49m). That leaves plenty of room to grow;
but as many internet companies now know, potential is not always enough.



 from FT.com


_______________________________________________
Crashlist website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base

Reply via email to