Won't someone cut to the chase: Did we begin with a Big Whimper instead of a
Big Bang?
bon moun wrote:
> >If it's free of religious nonsense, this book is must-read.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Neil G.
>
> It's not only free of religious nonsense, it describes an historical
> correlation between cosmological theories--that underpin theories in
> virutally every other realm--that vacillate between those connected to
> practice and those disconected from observation, and periods of social
> crisis. He clearly demonstrates that these "tendencies" are packed with
> ideological content, and that the Big Bang takes many of its cues from
> apocalyptic religions. He incorporates revolutions in cosmology, particle
> physics, and themodynamics, to show that Big Bang is a consequence of the
> separation of academic work from practical work, and that every
> contradiction encountered (and there have been many) has been met with yet
> another theory that can not be confirmed, resulting in a Rube Goldberg
> bastardation that substitutes for scientific practice. His
> historical-cosomological correlations are gems of the historical
> materialist method, even if he never acknowledges (or even realizes) that
> they are.
>
> "Teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom"
>
> Psalm 90
>
> _______________________________________________
> CrashList website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
--
_______________________________________________
CrashList website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
