On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:50:18PM +0100, Johanna Ploog wrote:
> On 1 January 2011 17:22, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote:
> > While swamp trees in water look better in water, they indeed do look ugly.
> > Let's use completely different tiles for them instead. Perhaps even
> > distinct feature enums so you can have a clue what the tree will turn to
> > when you cut it.
> >
> > I'd use willows rather than mangroves, but that's probably because I'm
> > used to the cold temperate zone rather than tropics. Or, we could even
> > use both (swamp tree on land vs swamp tree in water).
>
> We've got some kind of palm tree in the UNUSED section that, with some
> tweaks, might work well for Swamp.
I tried it for Shoals... it wouldn't fit a swampy place the slightest, while
being nice on sands. Too bad, having just a single variant makes it look
terribly repetitive.
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
// Never attribute to stupidity what can be
// adequately explained by malice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list
Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
