Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
---
>Oyvind Kolas proposed to make it possible to also store jpegs as read-only
>layers. I'm not sure how to make that work without, though.
The only thing that I could see JPEG being used for, which
isn't noted in your format description, is as a "preview" or
"thumbnail" image. It may also be worthwhile to have it as a "fully
composited" image - ala Photoshop - for applications that don't have
all the tools for composite on the fly but want to display the image.
---
Actually, I think jpegs for the actual raster data in some cases is perfectly
fine.
Use case 1: I have this jpeg 8MPixel photo, I just want to add some text to.
Why
should I make my file 3 times bigger, if all I need with noiseless precision is
the
text layer ?
Jpegs should not be the default pixel storage method, but I can't see why not
to
have fully functional jpeg layers.
JS
-><-
(That is joão on crappy webmail)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enviada pelo webmail da MPCnet: A Internet que funciona. http://www.mpc.com.br
Velocidade, qualidade e seguranca, em casa ou na empresa... Speedy MPCnet!
http://www.mpc.com.br/01info/speedy.html
_______________________________________________
CREATE mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
