On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:02, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Actually, I think jpegs for the actual raster data in some cases is > > perfectly fine. > > > > Use case 1: I have this jpeg 8MPixel photo, I just want to add some text > > to. Why should I make my file 3 times bigger, if all I need with > > noiseless precision is the text layer ? > > > > Jpegs should not be the default pixel storage method, but I can't see why > > not to have fully functional jpeg layers. > > I concur with that. JPEG as read only is perfectly fine, and probably > much better than a raw bitmap if the image imported comes from JPEG.
- Assuming there is no conversion from the original JPEG. - SVG text does not match well with PS style text in terms of layout. - PNG doesnt work with CMYK - Might want to support something else other than RGBA/CMYK - Dont forget CMYKA - so > 4 channel data Craig _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
