Hi, Jon Phillips wrote: > There are a few ways we can figure out which one to go with above. What > do you all think? > > 1.) EASIEST: Let the last 3 organizers of LGM's to make the decision and > be in complete agreement over the decision for next year.
I've previously proposed a committee made up of ex-organisers and the biggest attending projects. That is, a group of 6 with: Me, Louis, Kamila, and someone from each of the GIMP, Inkscape and Scribus (probably Sven, don't know who from Inkscape (Bryce maybe?) and either Peter or Craig). > 2.) EASY: We let the above proposals fill out by the proposers and then > we can all make comments on the proposals, and decide amongst ourselves > where to do the next LGM. That's probably a precondition, rather than an alternative to be honest :) > How does this sound to all? Is the above too complicated and/or place > too much strain on this process? I'm hopeful all get a chance to make > case, and set me straight if I'm off-point on anything in this email. :) Gathering comments is great, having a small group which represents the main stakeholders is good for reaching a finality and getting a decision. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +33 9 51 13 46 45 Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13 _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
