Hub - I recall that discussion and I know that it was passed on to the powers that be. I haven't looked at the updated language recently - have you?
As far as the "Adobe RGB" profile available on that web site - it is indeed in violation of our copyrights for that name (if nothing else) and we are taking the appropriate steps. ON THE OTHER HAND - I can say that Adobe has been working with the ISO to publish the technical details of the Adobe RGB profile so that "clones" can be correctly and legally produced. I expect that standard to be published sometime this year. Leonard Rosenthol Adobe Systems On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Hubert Figuiere <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 09:22 -0800, Jon Phillips wrote: > > Good, I've been fighting this one online recently. Factual data is not > > copyrightable. > > > > Releasing this type of information into the public domain is the right > > move. It will spread further too IMO. > > For now as it stand, the license does not even allow to freely > redistribute it as one is not allowed to even *repackage* (so much for > distro makers). > > Back then on the open-icc mailing list, when they where announced, I > criticized this and the dude from Adobe promised to look into it. That > was in 2005. > > > Hub > > _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create >
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
