Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2010 05:56:11 schrieb Jon Cruz: > On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Cyrille Berger wrote: > > Ok, I will clarify my opinion. I agree that swatchbook is more than just > > colors, that includes gradient, pattern, brushes, etc... And that we > > currently have no easy way to exchange swatchbook, between users, and > > applications. So we definitely need a specification for swatchbook. > > However, what I do not know (and therefor I have no opinion) is wether we > > need a specification for the gradient themselves, or if SVG gradients are > > enough, or if something is missing in SVG gradients. > > Yes. I did some analysis and it turns out that once you remove the physical > applications of gradients (and thus also linear vs. radial gradients) SVG > gradients are a subset of GIMP gradients. > > http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Swatch_Book#Gradient > > I'm also working on implementing this *right now* :-) > > Well, we've got some stuff going here at linux.conf.au and Christoph S. > needs the open format right away.
No, he doesn't ;) At least one ink vendor and Adobe will be attending LGM to discuss the new format. An existing draft wouldn't hurt, though :) Cheers, Christoph _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
