On 05/30/2010 09:20 PM, Marcos Diaz wrote:
Why not something short and concise like "Libre Artists"
In addition libreartists.org <http://libreartists.org> (and .net .com
.info) are available
Something to keep in mind, which was discussed at the meeting the other
day is that there is a lot to the name. The idea was to have a name with
suggests some official capacity, some resource for not only the various
projects, but also users, individual users of course, but also
collective commercial users like some corporation or maybe even
governmental organization to look to for help in adopting FOSS in
whatever graphics workflow(s) they may engage in. Finally, one must have
a name which has some intuitive meaning for potential donation sources.
Not necessarily an argument against libreartists, but what would someone
expect from an organization with a website named libreartists.org?
Greg
_______________________________________________
CREATE mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
