I would expect an ORGanization of libre artists, but I understand the point about a more official/corporative/governamental name, I agree.
But I think is better to keep it short and avoid names like: "FreeAndOpenSoftwareToCreateGraphicsWithLibreToolsAndEnviromentsOrganization" that nobody remember after 5 secons. 2010/5/30 Gregory Pittman <[email protected]> > On 05/30/2010 09:20 PM, Marcos Diaz wrote: > >> Why not something short and concise like "Libre Artists" >> >> In addition libreartists.org <http://libreartists.org> (and .net .com >> .info) are available >> > > Something to keep in mind, which was discussed at the meeting the other day > is that there is a lot to the name. The idea was to have a name with > suggests some official capacity, some resource for not only the various > projects, but also users, individual users of course, but also collective > commercial users like some corporation or maybe even governmental > organization to look to for help in adopting FOSS in whatever graphics > workflow(s) they may engage in. Finally, one must have a name which has some > intuitive meaning for potential donation sources. > > Not necessarily an argument against libreartists, but what would someone > expect from an organization with a website named libreartists.org? > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create > -- Marcos Díaz <[email protected]> Nathive project developer http://www.nathive.org/
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
