2011/2/15 Nathan Willis <[email protected]> > On 02/12/2011 06:32 PM, Gregory Pittman wrote: > > On 02/12/2011 06:45 AM, Femke Snelting wrote: > >> > >> Not sure about needing less talks, but in favour of having a few > >> well-prepared, moderated panels :-) > > > > +1 > > I would emphasize _well-prepared_. Better to have only one or just a > > few as long as they can be "guaranteed" (disclaimer: nothing can be > > guaranteed) to be top-notch. Keep the audience in mind. > > > I think "keeping the audience in mind" means if we can only come up with > one or two topics worthy of panel discussion, we don't set up multiple > panels just 'cause we can.... So are there concepts we can nail down? > If so, I'd suggest we want to get those in order *before* opening up the > call for individual submissions.... >
A panel on color should draw lots of attention. Color spaces, color profiles, inks, color separation, papers. Experts from the graphic industry would be invited. — I can take this one. On this path, we would also meet with Pantone people, who I believe could be interesting having at LGM (not the salespersons). To make that fully interesting to them too, we could organise a meeting between Pantone and a few Licence people from the community. Sorting out the licence issue could help everyone working with F/LOSS and spot colors, to the benefit of both. At least open the dialog. Louis > > Nate > > -- > nathan.p.willis > [email protected] > aim/ym/gtalk:n8willis > identi.ca/n8 > > _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create >
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
