On Tuesday 10 April 2012 Apr, Andrew Chadwick wrote: > On 09/04/12 20:29, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > Not in particular. I wouldn't mind having a manifest.xml file that > > has the version number and the creating app in it, though -- that's > > maybe a cleaner solution. Having a version number in the image tag > > could lead people think that this is the version of the image, not > > the file format. > > OpenRaster is patterned after OpenDocument, without actually being > OpenDocument. Perhaps its meta.xml might be a better model? It'd be nice > to have somewhere to dump Dublin Core metadata as well. > > http://books.evc-cit.info/odbook/ch02.html#meta-xml-section > > I'm envisaging at least our own meta:generator and > meta:standards-version, in addition to the dc: ones. > > RDF/XML might be an even better model for bags of metadata, at the risk > of making parsing and writing overcomplex. Opinions? > >
Ah, yes, of course! I meant meta.xml. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
