From my subjective observations, rm-toks-1 works fast, probably faster than
pass_peep::b
Shouldn't it be moved to the list of "normal" passes, and pass_peep::b to
"slow"?
Yes, it also occurred to me that we are close to being able to delete
peep::b, or move it out of the default set of passes.
Here are a few questions:
- does rm-toks-1 suffice? doesn't peep::b sometimes remove pairs or
groups of three tokens?
- isn't rm-toks-1 too stupid to be fast? it tries to remove every
single token including many that obviously cannot be removed without
creating a useless test case
John