There's nothing really evil in pass_peep::b, it just should never be run on
files
larger than 30K. I have not measured performance of rm-toks-1 on such files,
but I guess it scales much better.
I looked at pass_peep today.
Much of its functionality can be replaced by rm-toks-1 and rm-toks-2.
However, pass_peep also tries to replace identifiers and constants with
0 and 1, and there currently does not exist a token-based pass for doing
that. As soon as I write that pass, I'll move both peep::a and peep::b
to the --slow mode.
John
