Dear Christian-Emil,
Indeed, social relations are an open field in the CRM. What's not clear to me
is, which
empirical material to base on. May be too early.
Your examples below can be explained by the existing CRM:
Sister = birth with common mother & father. No group needed.
Master-client should be activity mediated: Apprenticeship.
This is more a question of how extended we regard an Activity could be.
I have difficulties to grasp the semantics of a generic non-event mediated
social relationship.
Legal relationships, such as slave and lord, may need other models than
friendship or
kinship.
May be too early to decide? In any case, I take your question for very
relevant, and we should collect
evidence from real data. Input welcome.
Best,
Martin
.
[email protected] wrote:
We have been studing TEI and CRM today. Family relations found in hold
historical sources can be expressed by the use of group. Eg two sisters
are members of a 'sister'-group'. But in many historical sources there
are relations like Master-client, tat is asymmetric relations . There is
no .1 type of being a member of a group. Such a .1 would have solved the
problem. Should this be added before the document goes to ISO?
Opinions?
Regards,
Christian-Emil
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Principle Researcher | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
