Dear Dan, Thanks a lot for sharing!
A stupid question first: what does "schema" refer to in this context? The one sadly missing elements because you have stolen them, I mean? Best, Øyvind On 14. nov. 2014, at 18:39, martin wrote: > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: "Geographycal" CRM > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:23:29 +0200 > From: Dan Matei <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > > Friends > > > (Still) working on converting my legacy data to CRM+ I arrived to geography > :-) > > > I felt the need to steel some elements from schema and I came-up with the > model (very informally) depicted here: > http://www.culturalia.ro/img/CPOT-geo-model-2014-11-12.jpg. > > > I could use some criticism, having enough doubts. > > > So, please give me advice. > > > Dan > > > PS. CPOT stands for "CRM Properties of Things" and identifies my local > extensions. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dan Matei > Institutul Național al Patrimoniului (National Heritage Institute) - București > Fundația Gellu Naum > TermRom - Asociația Română de Terminologie > > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
