Thanks. I'll look carefully to GeoSPARQL. Of course I prefer to re-use elements from "canonical" ontologies and not to re-invent the warm wheel :-)
Best, Dan On 20 November 2014 20:51, Paul Cripps <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Just to second Gerald, GeoSPARQL will probably give you the spatial > components you require. > > > > It is also possible to link GeoSPARQL directly to any ontology using the > methodology outlined in the GeoSPARQL User Guide (Battle & Kolas, 2012). > See the link below for an example of this. The approach I present is not as > articulated or have as much potential for full on spatio-temporal use as > CRMgeo but such lightweight approaches can still be useful; it’s working > nicely for my current research scenario. I’m also using WKT rather than GML > as it’s a bit less convoluted. > > > > http://gstar.archaeogeomancy.net/2014/11/extending-crmeh-with-geosparql/ > > > > All best, > > Paul. > > > > > > *From:* Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gerald > Hiebel > *Sent:* 18 November 2014 09:15 > *To:* 'Dan Matei'; 'Øyvind Eide' > *Cc:* 'crm-sig' > *Subject:* Re: [Crm-sig] "Geographycal" CRM > > > > Dear Dan, > > Looking at your extension CPOT I find some classes like line, polygon, > box... that are modelled in GeoSPARQL ( > http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql) which uses GML. You > could check there if you find other cpot elements like first_vertex,... . > To my knowledge it should be possible to represent all schema classes in > GeoSPARQL. > > We build the CRMgeo extension for CRM to link to GeoSPARQL ( > http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/index_main.php?l=e&c=661). It’s probably more > effort to get into it, but you would be standards conform and there already > exist some triple stores that can handle GeoSPARQL queries hoping to become > more. > > Best, > > Gerald > > > > *Von:* Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *Im Auftrag von *Dan Matei > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 18. November 2014 10:38 > *An:* Øyvind Eide > *Cc:* crm-sig > *Betreff:* Re: [Crm-sig] "Geographycal" CRM > > > > That's the source, dear Øyvind: > > > > http://schema.org/docs/schemas.html > > > > Did I understood your question ? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dan > > > > PS. They just realeased an upgrade: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Nov/0093.html > > > > > > On 18 November 2014 10:24, Øyvind Eide <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Dan, > > Thanks a lot for sharing! > > A stupid question first: what does "schema" refer to in this context? The > one sadly missing elements because you have stolen them, I mean? > > Best, > > Øyvind > > > On 14. nov. 2014, at 18:39, martin wrote: > > > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: "Geographycal" CRM > > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:23:29 +0200 > > From: Dan Matei <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > > > Friends > > > > > > (Still) working on converting my legacy data to CRM+ I arrived to > geography :-) > > > > > > I felt the need to steel some elements from schema and I came-up with > the model (very informally) depicted here: > http://www.culturalia.ro/img/CPOT-geo-model-2014-11-12.jpg. > > > > > > I could use some criticism, having enough doubts. > > > > > > So, please give me advice. > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > PS. CPOT stands for "CRM Properties of Things" and identifies my local > extensions. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dan Matei > > Institutul Național al Patrimoniului (National Heritage Institute) - > București > > Fundația Gellu Naum > > TermRom - Asociația Română de Terminologie > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Crm-sig mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig > > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dan Matei > Institutul Național al Patrimoniului (National Heritage Institute) - > București > Fundația Gellu Naum > TermRom - Asociația Română de Terminologie > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Matei Institutul Național al Patrimoniului (National Heritage Institute) - București Fundația Gellu Naum TermRom - Asociația Română de Terminologie
