Hi,

If I have interpreted your longer paper correctly, that means that the whole co-reference mechanism that the CRM has erected fails to address the practical requirement which I would have. That is, the ability for me to indicate that a word or phrase in a source document refers (in my opinion), to a specified real-world person (or other non-information object).

Have I got this right, and, if so, is there a CRM mechanism which /does /allow me to make this kind of assertion?

Best wishes,

Richard

On 04/02/2015 12:06, Øyvind Eide wrote:
Dear all,

Please find enclosed my homework for issue 230. It consists of two things:

* New scope notes for E91 Co-Reference Assignment, shortened to keep semantic web complexity out of the CRM. Thanks to Gerald for input.


* A draft for a document describing the complexity left out of the scope notes, based on Martin's previous scope notes and input from Arianna (but no responsibility on any of them for the result!). This document could be developed into a technical paper referred to from CRM, to an article, or both.



Best,

Øyvind
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

--
*Richard Light*

Reply via email to