crm-sig  

Messages by Thread

• [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Normal Custodian Of? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Normal Custodian Of? George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Normal Custodian Of? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Normal Custodian Of? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Normal Custodian Of? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Normal Custodian Of? Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Quantification of P160, P161 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUES: quantification of P169,170,171, 172 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] workshop tutorials at CIDOC 2020: September 19-25, 2020? Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] workshop tutorials at CIDOC 2020: September 19-25, 2020? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] workshop tutorials at CIDOC 2020: September 19-25, 2020? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] workshop tutorials at CIDOC 2020: September 19-25, 2020? George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] workshop tutorials at CIDOC 2020: September 19-25, 2020? Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] workshop tutorials at CIDOC 2020: September 19-25, 2020? Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] New issue: broaden scope of P126 (from issue 436) Athanasios Velios
• [Crm-sig] Issue 332 homework: split sample Athanasios Velios
• [Crm-sig] Issue 425: Example for I11 Situation Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 425: Example for I11 Situation, NEW Issue: Situation Time-Span. Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
• [Crm-sig] relative position under and over Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • [Crm-sig] Relative position under and over - adjusted text Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Relative position under and over - adjusted text Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Relative position under and over - adjusted text Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Relative position under and over - adjusted text George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Relative position under and over - adjusted text Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Use of E3 Condition State Athanasios Velios
• Re: [Crm-sig] HW ISSUE 438, No E18 IsA E92 Øyvind Eide
• [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: space and time primitives are appellations. Martin Doerr
• Re: [Crm-sig] Crm-sig Digest, Vol 156, Issue 56 Stefan Gradmann
• [Crm-sig] two archaeological questions Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Maximilian Schich
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE mvanruymbeke
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE Carlisle, Philip
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE melanie . roche
• [Crm-sig] Native Language Spanish Speaker and CRM Expert George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] Next Meeting 25-28 February 2020 Eleni Tsoulouha
  • [Crm-sig] Call for papers: Data for History 2020 - Modelling Time, Space, Agents Francesco Beretta
• [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of E94 Space Primitive Bekiari Xrysoula
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of E94 Space Primitive Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Bekiari Xrysoula
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Carlisle, Philip
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of) Jutta Lindenthal
• [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Dan Matei
  • Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Maria Jose de Almeida
  • Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ? Dan Matei
• [Crm-sig] Examples for P189 approximates Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE FOL for properties with range type Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE P172 quantification Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] and now something completely different - a modelling question Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE 426 - "holds or supports" as super property of P56 bears feature Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 463: Scope note of E37 Mark Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 463: Scope note of E37 Mark Ethan Gruber
• [Crm-sig] agents of deterioration Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] agents of deterioration Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW: Issue 431 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] HW: Issue 431 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] draft minutes of the last sig meeting Bekiari Xrysoula
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120, Allen operators -email vote(?) Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Detlev Balzer
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Francesco Beretta
  • [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Detlev Balzer
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management Robert Casties
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Detlev Balzer
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120, Allen operators -email vote(?) Bekiari Xrysoula
• [Crm-sig] Normal Custodian Of? Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] CIDOC-CRM implementation using a labeled-property graph Maria Jose de Almeida
• [Crm-sig] Homework Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value? Robert Sanderson
  • [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value? Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value? Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Creative Process Representation extension Anaïs Guillem
• [Crm-sig] E8 scope note nitpick Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E8 scope note nitpick Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Attribute Assignment of .1 properties Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Quantification of .1 properties Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE 420 continued Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 420 continued Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 420 continued Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE 420 continued: Change of scope note of E18 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE: New property Pxxx defines (is defined by) Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: New property Pxxx defines (is defined by) Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Tony Gill
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Matthew Stiff
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Hiebel, Gerald
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause patrick . le-boeuf
• [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Scope Note of E77 Persistent Item needs revision Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Scope Note of E77 Persistent Item needs revision Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Ethan Gruber
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] A symbol made of symbols Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Recording absence Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Recording absence van Leusen, P.M.
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Recording absence Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Recording absence van Leusen, P.M.
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Recording absence Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] P156 scope note updated (ISSUE410) Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] For Issue 429 has language Pat Riva
• [Crm-sig] HW of ISSUE 422 – Substance of Phase Francesco Beretta
• Re: [Crm-sig] Crm-sig Digest, Vol 153, Issue 64 Stefan Gradmann
• [Crm-sig] dinner tonight (45th crm-sig meeting) E. Tsoulouha
• [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Bekiari Xrysoula
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Krause, Siegfried
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Pat Riva
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Olivier Marlet
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Christos Papatheodorou
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: about the introductory text for the “Use and Learn” section of the CRM site Pierre Choffé

• Earlier messages
• Later messages