The SIG decide 8-10 years ago to use  E74 Group to model relations between 
persons.  From a practical point of view this is very handy. A relation is 
simply an instance of E74 group of E21 Persons where the persons in question  
are members. The intention behind   E74 Group is that the group as such can act 
as one unit.  As Martin pointed out :"I could quite well imagine having a sort 
of more general Group describing a social bond that would not involve members 
potentially "acting as one" or one speaking for them.  In that case, that Group 
would no more be "one Actor". (Martin Doerr 4/8/2014). 

In prosopography (see for example http://snapdrgn.net/) and in social 
anthropology one may be interested in relations between persons not naturally 
acting as a single actor . For example, my great grandfather aunt (born in the 
end of 18th century) and I may be related but do not have the potential to 
acting as one actor. 

The excerpt from ULAN below, shows besides family relationships a  
student/teacher relationship. I would claim that it is not necessary  so that a 
student and a teacher should be seen as  members of a E74 Group. 

Still we need to be able to model such relations. It is of course possible to 
extend CRM with new properties for each relevant relationship. One may also 
extend CRM with a generic relationship property with a .1 E55 Type property 
indicating the kind of the relationship. The one need one generic property for 
binary relationships, one for trinary  etc etc. 

A solution may be to introduce a single relationship group which is not a 
subclass of E39 Actor, but with the similar membership properties as  E74. One 
may argue that (social) relationships are abstract entities originating in 
humans' minds. Therefore the class of such "relationship groups" should be a 
subclass of E28 Conceptual Object. A relationship is not a type but has a type. 
It is hardly a legal object(?) It could be a subclass of P89 Propositional 
Object?

We need some discussion here. 


Chr-Emil




********************************
ULAN excerpts 

Christian Krohg
Related People or Corporate Bodies:
parent of ....  Krohg, Per  
................        (Norwegian painter, costume designer, and scenographer, 
1889-1965) [500009787]
spouse of ....  Krohg, Oda  
................        (Norwegian painter, 1860-1935) [500069715]
student of ....         Gude, Hans Fredrik  
..................      (Norwegian painter, 1825-1903) [500004718]
student of ....         Gussow, Karl  
..................      (German painter, 1843-1907) [500031129]
student of ....         Middelthun, Julius Olavus  1870-1871
..................      (Norwegian sculptor, 1820-1886) [500122010]
teacher of ....         Eiebakke, August  1886-1887
..................      (Norwegian painter, 1867-1938) [500093351]

Oda Krohg
Related People or Corporate Bodies:
spouse of ....  Krohg, Christian  
................        (Norwegian painter, draftsman, and author, 1852-1925) 
[500011632]

Per Krohg
Related People or Corporate Bodies:
child of ....   Krohg, Christian  
..............  (Norwegian painter, draftsman, and author, 1852-1925) 
[500011632]
teacher of ....         Storstein, Aage  
..................      (Norwegian painter, 1900-1983) [500091511]




Reply via email to