On 17/05/2015 13:37, martin wrote:
Dear All,

The CIDOC CRM master in a logical sense is an SIS-TELOS knowledge base, product of ICS-FORTH since 1990, which guarantees the formal logical consistency of IsA relations of classes and properties. It provides much better views than Protege.
TELOS can be transformed into RDF/RDFS, except for property-properties.
Otherwise, there were never a consistent version, not talking of a bunch of extensions.

From this, the Word document is manually maintained and the Cross-Reference Manual and RDFS is semiautomatically generated.

This is not satisfactory, because we have to create "in sync" the Word document, an LoD version, the RDFS versions, OWL versions, Translations and their versions in several languages, amendment lists and preferably pointers to issues and e-mail discussions. All this times the extensions, and now even with an FOL notation. Tomorrow RDFS may be abandoned for another model. We may like to have 3 RDFS syntax forms.

I do not see any means to maintain all this in XML only. We have tried in the past TMX for the translations, but it turned out to be complex and tools were not tuned to that. Multilingual manual writing tools could do part of the job, but not the logics.
My experience (from working with SPECTRUM) is that you can use XML as the single source of a range of documents, each of which is produced by an appropriate XSLT transform. If you need another delivery format, you just write a new transform.

These products can be textual in nature (e.g. HTML pages - which are BTW something which is needed for the CRM; PDF documents) or machine-processible logical documents (e.g. RDFS, OWL, XML Schema).

If your SIS-TELOS system had an import function, data could be output from the XML representation in a format which could be loaded into TELOS. This would allow TELOS to continue its role of cross-checking the formal logical consistency of the CRM as it develops.

Best wishes,

Richard

Appears we are first on the world to take formal ontologies seriously, otherwise, all this should exist on the market. The complexity of creating user documents seems not to be common knowledge.

Currently, we are about finalizing the alpha version of the new CRM Website. It became a complex piece of S/W, with a database in the center managing the logical structure of the CRM master document and all by-products as tables and fields. We hope that it will help collaborative work on these products:
Think of updating a Chinese version of a scope note etc.

A TEI encoded version could be an intermediate product. Need to undestand what we gain. Could be interesting for interfacing with other apps. Word is very handy to do edit changes during discussions on the screen. Impossible without a WYSIWYG editor.

We'll present details this week.

Best,

Martin

On 17/5/2015 1:24 μμ, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
It seems to me self-evident that the CRM should be managed as an information resource (ie as a structured XML file) instead of a word-processor presentational document. And if its going to be in XML, I'd agree that TEI is the obvious format to choose since it is already used for literate programming, and has a lot of the necessary elements and semantic constructs, and tools, all in space. It is not insignificant that the TEI is aligned with the CRM in that its interested in digital cultural heritage, and that the TEI is consciously interested in the relationship between its world and the CRMs.

However, I would like to hear more from Martin or whoever on how the CRM is authored at the moment. What is the master copy, how is it managed, what are the tools used and/or needed by the editors? is the appearance of being a large Word document actually right?

As the author/maintainer of much of the TEI processing software (including OxGarage which Jim mentioned) and the chief designer of its current meta language, I can fairly lay claim to being someone who understands the implications :-} Nothing would make me happier [1] than helping transform the CRM master into a beautiful TEI XML file, if there
is sufficient interest.

[1] thats not actually true. I have a long list.

Sebastian Rahtz
Chief Data Architect
University of Oxford IT Services




_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--

--------------------------------------------------------------
  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
  Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
                                |  Email:[email protected]  |
                                                              |
                Center for Cultural Informatics               |
                Information Systems Laboratory                |
                 Institute of Computer Science                |
    Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                                                              |
                N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
                 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
                                                              |
              Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl            |
--------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

--
*Richard Light*

Reply via email to