Wow, Oyvind! Thank you for proving why you are such a valued member of my #cidocCRM/#TEI Personal Learning Network (#PLN). :-) These are very interesting and informative Scope Notes. Rather than leave it at simple, short description, you have examined subtleties of modeling decisions, etc. that a prospective user will be thinking about. Every Entity does not need such an extensive Scope Note, but there are most certainly "core" Entities that will benefit from such expanded insights. Using Scope Notes to conveniently provide in-context Best Practice modeling advice will be most helpful as we evolve to greater use of the #cidocCRM for S/W design and development. While museum professionals will have much domain knowledge context to bring to reading the Definition document, S/W developers -- many expert at modeling but without domain knowledge -- will find such thoughtful notes very helpful. One big point Oyvind's notes demonstrate is how valuable it will be to go to a finer-grained semantically tagged format for the Definition document. It is obvious reading these notes how natural it would be to have "hover pop-ups" and clickable links to open the full #cidocCRM definition to "need to know" exploration typical of S/W documentation/reference. Oyvind: Tiny typo... Paragraph three of E18 says " An instances of E18..." where the case is "pluralized" and just needs the 's' deleted. Congratulations on getting your "homework" in on time! :-) -: Jim :- Sent using CloudMagic [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2] On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Øyvind Eide <[email protected]> wrote: Dear all,
Please find drafts for new scope notes below. Best, Øyvind E4 Period Subclass of: E2 Temporal Entity E92 Spacetime Volume Superclass of: E5 Event Scope note: This class comprises sets of coherent phenomena or cultural manifestations occurring in time and space. It is the social or physical coherence of these phenomena that identify an E4 Period and not the associated spatiotemporal extent. This extent is only the “ground” or space in an abstract physical sense that the actual process of growth, spread and retreat has covered. Consequently, different periods can overlap and coexist in time and space, such as when a nomadic culture exists in the same area and time as a sedentary culture. This also means that overlapping land use rights, common among first nations, amounts to overlapping periods. Typically this class is used to describe prehistoric or historic periods such as the “Neolithic Period”, the “Ming Dynasty” or the “McCarthy Era”, but also geopolitical units and activities of settlements are regarded as special cases of E4 Period. As the actual extent of an E4 Period in spacetime we regard the trajectories of the participating physical things during their participation in an instance of E4 Period, the open spaces via which they have interacted and the spaces by which they had the potential to interact during that period or event in the way defined by the type of the respective period or event, such as the air in a meeting room transferring the voices. Since these phenomena are fuzzy, we assume the spatiotemporal extent to be contiguous, except for cases of phenomena spreading out over islands or other separated areas, including geopolitical units distributed over disconnected areas such as islands or colonies. Whether the trajectories necessary for participants to travel between these areas are regarded as part of the spatiotemporal extent or not has to be decided in each case based on a concrete analysis, taking use of the sea for other purposes than travel, such as fishing, into consideration. One may also argue that the activities to govern disconnected areas imply travelling through spaces connecting them and that these areas hence are spatially connected in a way, but it appears counterintuitive to consider for instance travel routes in international waters as extensions of geopolitical units. Consequently, instances of E4 Period may occupy each a limited number of disjoint spacetime volumes, however there must not be a discontinuity in the total timespan covered by these spacetime volumes. Nevertheless, an instance of E4 Period must be contiguous in time. I.e., if it has ended in all areas, it has ended as a whole, but it may involve one area after another, such as the Polynesian migration, as long as it is ongoing at least in one area. We model E4 Period as a subclass of E2 Temporal Entity and of E92 Spacetime volume. The latter is intended as a phenomenal spacetime volume as defined in CRMgeo (Doerr and Hiebel 2013). By virtue of this multiple inheritance we can discuss the physical extent of an E4 Period without representing each instance of it together with an instance of its associated spacetime volume. This model combines two quite different kinds of substance: an instance of E4 Period is a phenomena while a spacetime volume is an aggregation of points in spacetime. However, the real spatiotemporal extent of an instance of E4 Period is regarded to be unique to it due to all its details and fuzziness; its identity and existence depends uniquely on the identity of the instance of E4 Period. Therefore this multiple inheritance is unambiguous and effective and furthermore corresponds to the intuitions of natural language. There are no assumptions about the scale of the associated phenomena. In particular all events are seen as synthetic processes consisting of coherent phenomena. Therefore E4 Period is a superclass of E5 Event. For example, a modern clinical E67 Birth can be seen as both an atomic E5 Event and as an E4 Period that consists of multiple activities performed by multiple instances of E39 Actor. There are two different conceptualisations of ‘artistic style’, defined either by physical features or by historical context. For example, “Impressionism” can be viewed as a period lasting from approximately 1870 to 1905 during which paintings with particular characteristics were produced by a group of artists that included (among others) Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, Sisley and Degas. Alternatively, it can be regarded as a style applicable to all paintings sharing the characteristics of the works produced by the Impressionist painters, regardless of historical context. The first interpretation is an E4 Period, and the second defines morphological object types that fall under E55 Type. Another specific case of an E4 Period is the set of activities and phenomena associated with a settlement, such as the populated period of Nineveh. Examples: ● Jurassic ● European Bronze Age ● Italian Renaissance ● Thirty Years War ● Sturm und Drang ● Cubism Properties: P7 took place at (witnessed): E53 Place P8 took place on or within (witnessed): E18 Physical Thing P9 consists of (forms part of): E4 Period E18 Physical Thing Subclass of: E72 Legal Object Superclass of: E19 Physical Object E24 Physical Man-Made Thing E26 Physical Feature Scope Note: This class comprises all persistent physical items with a relatively stable form, man-made or natural. Depending on the existence of natural boundaries of such things, the CRM distinguishes the instances of E19 Physical Object from instances of E26 Physical Feature, such as holes, rivers, pieces of land etc. Most instances of E19 Physical Object can be moved (if not too heavy), whereas features are integral to the surrounding matter. An instances of E18 Physical Thing occupies not only a particular geometric space, but in the course of its existence it performs a trajectory through spacetime, which occupies a real, that is phenomenal, volume in spacetime. We include in the occupied space the space filled by the matter of the physical thing and all its inner spaces, such as the inner of a box. Physical things consisting of aggregations of physically unconnected objects, such as a set of chessmen, occupy a number of individually contiguous spacetime volumes equal to the number of unconnected objects that constitute them. We model E18 Physical Thing to be a subclass of E72 Legal Object and of E92 Spacetime volume. The latter is intended as a phenomenal spacetime volume as defined in CRMgeo (Doerr and Hiebel 2013). By virtue of this multiple inheritance we can discuss the physical extent of an E18 Physical Thing without representing each instance of it together with an instance of its associated spacetime volume. This model combines two quite different kinds of substance: an instance of E18 Physical Thing is matter while a spacetime volume is an aggregation of points in spacetime. However, the real spatiotemporal extent of an instance of E18 Physical Thing is regarded to be unique to it due to all its details and fuzziness; its identity and existence depends uniquely on the identity of the instance of E18 Physical Thing. Therefore this multiple inheritance is unambiguous and effective and furthermore corresponds to the intuitions of natural language. The CRM is generally not concerned with amounts of matter in fluid or gaseous states. Examples: ● the Cullinan Diamond (E19) ● the cave “Ideon Andron” in Crete (E26) ● the Mona Lisa (E22) Properties: P44 has condition (is condition of): E3 Condition State P45 consists of (is incorporated in): E57 Material P46 is composed of (forms part of): E18 Physical Thing P49 has former or current keeper (is former or current keeper of): E39 Actor P50 has current keeper (is current keeper of): E39 Actor P51 has former or current owner (is former or current owner of): E39 Actor P52 has current owner (is current owner of): E39 Actor P53 has former or current location (is former or current location of): E53 Place P58 has section definition (defines section): E46 Section Definition P59 has section (is located on or within): E53 Place P128 carries (is carried by): E90 Symbolic Object _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
