I assume the wording is about what the model (that is the editors of the model) allows or enables the user to formulate. The perspective is the instructor's and not an ontological commitment. This perspective and the wording Is not good.
C-E >-----Original Message----- >From: Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of martin >Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:43 PM >To: crm-sig >Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE:scope note style > >Dear All, > >I believe this scope note: > > >P115 finishes (is finished by) >Domain: E2 Temporal Entity >Range: E2 Temporal Entity >Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n) >Scope note: This property allows the ending point for a E2 Temporal >Entity >to be situated by reference to the ending point of another temporal entity of >longer duration. > >...is not good! > >How can a property "allow" reality to be? >Same for all Allen's relationships > >Best, > >Martin >-- > >-------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 | > Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 | > | Email: [email protected] | > | > Center for Cultural Informatics | > Information Systems Laboratory | > Institute of Computer Science | > Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | > | > N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, | > GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | > | > Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | >--------------------------------------------------------------
