Hello all, I wanted to get confirmation on the correct application of the Cidoc-crm in the case of checksum hashes (i.e. fixity values).
For instance if the hash of a digital image file computes to: 6b8dca09e851a987050463c9c60603e9ad797ba09117056fc2e0c07bcac66e43 My first thought would be to use: E38_Image - P1_is_identified_by - E42_Identifier (hash value) E42_Identifier - P2_has_type - "SHA256 HASH" However, the scope notes for E42_Identifier explicitly states: The class E42 Identifier is not normally used for machine-generated identifiers A hash is definitely machine generated, so what are the other options here? Should I use a different ontology for this case? Thanks, Daniel Riley Verisart
