Dear Chryssoula and others

it seems that I will unfortunately miss also this SIG meeting. Instead, Paola 
and Achille are coming and will report on some interesting thoughts come up at 
the Poznan TPDL workshop on the CRM. They are now looking for flights and may 
arrive at some time on Tuesday, depending on connections and seat availability. 
Thus they may miss the 1st day of the SIG meeting, Tuesday 6th. 

There is one small thing coming up during the Poznan discussion which might 
concern the discussion on Tuesday, according to the agenda, so I summarize it 
below.

E92 Space-time volume is the domain of the two properties P160 has temporal 
projection, and P161 has spatial projection. However these two properties link 
E92 respectively to an E52 Time-span and to a E53 Place; these are the 
*overall* projection of the E92, i.e. throughout any place (P160) and any time 
(P161).
Additionally, there exists P164 is restricted by, which generates a new 
Space-time volume, actually a subclass E93, restricted to a specific Time-span. 
It may be useful to restrict these projections at a specific place (for P160) 
and at a specific time (for P161).
So one could consider the utility of defining 
P160.1 at E53 Place. It characterizes the temporal projection (a Time-span) of 
E92 at a specific Place
P161.1 at E52 Time-span. It characterizes the spatial projection (a Place) of 
E92 at (during) a given Time-Span. 

Actually the same effect of P161.1 may obtained this way: E92 Space-time 
Volume: P164 is restricted by; E52 Time-span: P161 has spatial projection: E53 
Place.
So P161.1 is a sort of shortcut, but it complements nicely the proposed P160.1.

Here is a an example: the space-time volume describing the 4D extent of Iron 
Age in Europe

P160 -> Which was the time span of Iron Age (answer: from 11th century BC until 
circa 1100 AD)
P160.1 -> Which was the time span of Iron Age in England? (answer: from 800 BC 
until 43 AD)

P161 -> Where was Iron Age (answer: all Europe)
P161.1 -> Where was Iron Age during the 1st century AD? (answer: the areas not 
yet conquered by the Romans at year 1 AD, approximately modern time UK, 
Germany, Scandinavia, Eastern Europe; part of these were conquered during the 
century)

The Pleiades mapping paper, presented at Poznan, has full-fledged scope notes 
for the above.

Best wishes

Franco




Prof Franco Niccolucci
Director, VAST-LAB
PIN - U. of Florence
Scientific Coordinator
ARIADNE - PARTHENOS

Piazza Ciardi 25
59100 Prato, Italy





> Il giorno 28/set/2015, alle ore 19:56, Chryssoula Bekiari 
> <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> 
> Dear All
> 
> I would like to ask you about your participation to the forthcoming meeting 
> in Crete.
> The provisional agenda of the meeting has been published on the site  
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/special_interest_meetings.html
> 
> best regards
> 
> Chryssoula
> 
> PS.
> You may find also the new versions of CIDOC CRM, CRMarchaeo, CRMgeo in the 
> following links
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/official_release_cidoc.html
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/technical_papers.html
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chryssoula Bekiari
> Research and Development Engineer
> 
> Center for Cultural Informatics / Information Systems Laboratory
> Institute of Computer Science
> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
> 
> N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
> Phone: +30 2810 391631, Fax: +30 2810 391638, Skype: xrysmp
> E-mail: [email protected]
> 
> Web-site: 
> http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/people/people_individual.jsp?Person_ID=13
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


Reply via email to