-----Original Message----- From: Christian-Emil Smith Ore <[email protected]> List-Post: [email protected] Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:01:51 +0000
> > The stone with scratches/inscription and empirical data. When it was accepted > that there were only scratches on the stone and not > inscriptions, in an ideal world the stone still must be kept to make the > results reproducible. It should be kept not only for that. It is (at a "metalevel" ?) scientific heritage: it illustrates a fine scientific gaffe :-) Dan
