Dear Philip,

I share the opinion of Steve. A general association of historical nature is utterly incompatible with the whole philosophy of the CRM. If a source refers some things as related in an unspecified way, we can only blame the source as information object for it. This could cover the "if you are interested...then...". We need some least semantics, otherwise any reasoning breaks down. This can be done by interpreting the respective vocabulary, if a relation type is provided. Minimal semantics are for instance parthood, presence, influence, similarity (parallels or causal), common type, etc.

Users should be forced to be more specific. It is hard to imagine, that a user knows a relationship but nothing about it. I'd argue that such links are a result of underspecified documentation practice, and not of indeterminacy of scientific knowledge.

Of course, you can add a non-CRM compatible extension ;-), if you have no better knowledge of the documented fact.

Other opinions?

Best,

Martin

On 15/9/2016 1:54 μμ, Stephen Stead wrote:

I would probably model these in one of two ways depending on the nature of the general association.

A] As parts of a larger physical man made thing; so in your example the telephone box and the exchange a part of a regional telecommunications system which in turn is part of a national telecommunications system.

B] As both being present/participating in a period, event or activity; so this Napoleonic sea fort and this Napoleonic military canal are constructed as events that form part of the Napoleonic British Defence Period.

I suppose as a last resort you could create an Information Object which refers to them all and name the Information Object as “A list of things which I am interested in for X reason”; your essay of why could then be attached via P3 has note. In this case what you are modelling is not the relationship between the things but your/your organisation’s believe that there is a relationship (however tenuous!) between them.

HTH

SdS

Stephen Stead

Tel +44 20 8668 3075

Mob +44 7802 755 013

E-mail [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

LinkedIn Profile http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads

*From:*Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Carlisle, Philip
*Sent:* 15 September 2016 11:16
*To:* crm-sig ([email protected]) <[email protected]>
*Subject:* [Crm-sig] Associative relationship mapping

Hi all,

The Arches project moves on a pace and is in the process of modifying the graphs for version 4.

In the original graphs we used a British Museum extension property (PXX_is_related_to) as a work around to allow us to represent the general association relationship we had in legacy datasets. eg. this telephone kiosk has a general association with this telephone exchange.

We now want to continue to be able to model a general association but the only property available P69 has association with (is associated with) is restricted in its domain and range to E29 Design or Procedure.

How do we model the ‘If you’re interested in that you might be interested in this’ nature of the general association between two physical man made things?

All thoughts appreciated.

Phil

*Phil Carlisle*

Knowledge Organization Specialist

Listing Group, Historic England

Direct Dial: +44 (0)1793 414824

http://thesaurus.historicengland.org.uk/

http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/

Listing Information Services fosters an environment where colleagues are valued for their skillsand knowledge, and where communication, customer focus and working in partnership are at the heart of everything we do.



_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--

--------------------------------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
 Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
                               |  Email: [email protected] |
                                                             |
               Center for Cultural Informatics               |
               Information Systems Laboratory                |
                Institute of Computer Science                |
   Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                                                             |
               N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
                GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
                                                             |
             Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl           |
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to