On 22/9/2016 8:48 μμ, Simon Spero wrote:
If the CRM is interpreted as an OWL ontology, then the most general
relationship between two objects is *owl:topObjectProperty. *
This property has very weak semantics (e.g. that there is some known
relationship between a and b).
One benefit / problem with using this property is that it is a super
property of all object properties, so you may need to be careful to
turn inference on / off.
You can also define your own equivalent placeholder, which will make
it easier to use inference when you can start upgrading to more
specific relationships.
Simon
Sounds like a good solution! It is standard, and obviously less
committed than anything in the CRM...
Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
