Robert I believe you are correct. They are different appellations of the same conceptual object. I think that the idea was to show that it was the E28 not the name that we were interested in. It obviously fails the usability test! Perhaps we could run the two examples together and say:- ‘Maxwell equations’ [preferred subject access point from LCSH, http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85082387, as of 19 November 2012] also known as ‘Equations, Maxwell’ [variant subject access point, from the same source] Rgds SdS
Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail [email protected] LinkedIn Profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/ -----Original Message----- From: Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Sanderson Sent: 05 September 2017 22:39 To: [email protected] Subject: [Crm-sig] E28 Examples Dear all, The final two examples of E28 Conceptual Object are: * ‘Maxwell equations’ [preferred subject access point from LCSH, http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85082387, as of 19 November 2012] * ‘Equations, Maxwell’ [variant subject access point, from the same source] Is this meant to imply that these are /different/ E28s? The example was clearly explicitly chosen, so I wonder what it was meant to demonstrate, as I would have expected these to be two different Appellations for the same Conceptual Object. Thanks for any clarifications, Rob _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
