Yup, the missing classes was the issue :) Thanks Martin!
Rob On 9/6/17, 6:54 AM, "Crm-sig on behalf of martin" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: On 9/6/2017 12:39 AM, Robert Sanderson wrote: > Dear all, > > The final two examples of E28 Conceptual Object are: > > * ‘Maxwell equations’ [preferred subject access point from LCSH, > http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85082387, as of 19 November 2012] > * ‘Equations, Maxwell’ [variant subject access point, from the same source] > > Is this meant to imply that these are /different/ E28s? The example was clearly explicitly chosen, so I wonder what it was meant to demonstrate, as I would have expected these to be two different Appellations for the same Conceptual Object. In addition to my previous remarks, yes, two different E28 naming another E28, realizing another E28;-) Best, martin > > Thanks for any clarifications, > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 | Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 | | Email: [email protected] | | Center for Cultural Informatics | Information Systems Laboratory | Institute of Computer Science | Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, | GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | -------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
