?A
________________________________ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Jim Salmons <[email protected]> Sent: 04 January 2018 16:58 To: 'crm-sig' Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE Choice (A) Happy-Healthy New Year, -: Jim :- Jim Salmons Twitter: @Jim_Salmons www.FactMiners.org<http://www.FactMiners.org> (#CitizenScience project) www.SoftalkApple.com<http://www.SoftalkApple.com> (#DigitalHistory project) www.medium.com/@Jim_Salmons/<http://www.medium.com/@Jim_Salmons/> (my #CognitiveComputing/#DigitalHumanities articles) From: Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Doerr Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:32 AM To: crm-sig <[email protected]> Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE Dear All, Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for inverse also the order of the two labels?: e.g.: A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of? (has translation) OR B) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i has translation (is translation of) ? PLEASE VOTE A or B. Best, Martin -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 | Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 | | Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | | Center for Cultural Informatics | Information Systems Laboratory | Institute of Computer Science | Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, | GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | --------------------------------------------------------------
