On 28.11.18 14:47, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> 
> Action from the SIG meeting to send information about partitioning of names:

We are regularly fighting with bibliographical reference systems (Drupal
Biblio and bibcite modules, CSL styles, EndNote, Zotero) and how they
(not) deal with Arabic[1], Spanish[2], and Chinese names.

I have not done any extensive research but I have not seen any
encompassing support for schemes other than first-middle-last name or
consistent and usable rules for how to press e.g. Arabic names into
first-middle-last.

If anybody has pointers to good solutions I would be grateful :-)

Cheers
        Robert C.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_names
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_naming_customs


> Personal Names:
> 
> MARC has three subfields for name, in the bibliographic USMARC:
>    https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd100.html
>    Which has a lot of name fields, but also a lot of related things to a name 
> (such as date of a work in subfield f)
> 
> And the equivalent in MODS, for the type of namePart:
>     https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/userguide/name.html#namepart
>     given, family, date, and termsOfAddress
> 
> In the Getty AAT vocabulary, we have the following types of names
>   
> http://www.getty.edu/vow/AATHierarchy?find=&logic=AND&note=&subjectid=300266386
> 
> Which include both type of the complete name (e.g. noms de guerres) and parts 
> of names (middle name).
> And name related concepts generally
>     
> http://www.getty.edu/vow/AATHierarchy?find=&logic=AND&note=&page=1&subjectid=300404653
> 
> Which includes prefix/suffix/title and similar.
> 
> Place Names:
> 
> For places, we have looked at the FGDC endorsed standard:
>     https://www.fgdc.gov/fgdc-news/fgdc-endorses-address-data-standard
>     https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/address-data
> 
> Which is … comprehensive, to say the least.  We then cherry-picked the bits 
> that we thought most useful, given the level of data description that we need 
> for cultural heritage purposes.
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Martin Doerr 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 11:11 PM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings
> 
> Dear Richard,
> 
> XML is even better. The distinction between XML tags and MARC subfield 
> markers is not so substantial. An XML file is still a string. The question is 
> about RDF, putting a compound into rdfs:Literal.
> So, again, is there a good practice with XML elements ????
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 11/21/2018 6:58 PM, Richard Light wrote:
> 
> On 15/11/2018 21:28, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I would expect that the library or archival community do have a good practice 
> how to "squeeze" a compound name, such as :
> "His Majesty Dr. Snoopy Hickup Miller Jr", with respective separators, in a 
> machine readable string, that could be used as custom datatype in an 
> rdfs:Literal as one instance of Appellation, rather than defining all 
> possible name constituents as individual rdf properties.
> 
> Could be a MARC string? XML? TEI?
> 
> This would be very helpful for our users.
> Martin,
> 
> I'm pretty sure that the most recent attempt at doing this will be the 
> subfield markers ($a, etc.) in MARC. which date from the era of punched 
> cards.  The requirement that all of the name appears in a single string will 
> rule out anything that might have been done in XML (where you might typically 
> use attributes or subelements) or TEI (which is, after all, simply an XML 
> application).
> 
> It's a nice idea, which follows the approach of encoding one 'compound' value 
> as a single string, but I don't think we will find a ready-made standard for 
> it.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> Martin
> 
> --
> Richard Light
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Crm-sig mailing list
> 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
>  Dr. Martin Doerr
> 
> 
> 
>  Honorary Head of the
> 
>  Center for Cultural Informatics
> 
> 
> 
>  Information Systems Laboratory
> 
>  Institute of Computer Science
> 
>  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
> 
> 
> 
>  N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
> 
>  GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
> 
> 
> 
>  Vox:+30(2810)391625
> 
>  Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>  Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
> 


-- 
Dr. Robert Casties -- Information Technology Group
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Boltzmannstr. 22, D-14195 Berlin
Tel: +49/30/22667-342 Fax: -299

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to