I support this!:-)
Martin
On 3/6/2020 1:56 AM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
Dear all,
At a recent Linked Art meeting we discussed how to model “find
events”, and S19 and O19 were agreed upon as the correct modeling
constructs. We also discussed why S19 is an “encounter” rather than a
“find” or “discovery”, as is very well described in the scope notes
for the class.
However, the properties of S19 would benefit from some attention
towards consistency. If S19 is encountering, then it seems
counterproductive to have O19 as being “has found object” and O21 “has
found at”, undoing all the good culturally sensitive work of explained
in S19.
I would propose that O19 and 21 be relabeled to “encountered object
(was object encountered by)” and “encountered at (witnessed encounter)”.
Many thanks for your consideration,
Rob
--
*Dr. Robert Sanderson*, **Semantic Architect | Getty Digital |
getty.edu <http://getty.edu/>
signature_1632129958
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
