Dear All

*P195 was a presence of* (had presence)
Domain: E93 Presence
Range:    E18 Physical Thing

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1 : 0,n)

Is wrong. This is a shortcut through P166, which is necessary, but an instance of E93 Presence may be defined on spacetime volumes others than that of an E18.

Therefore:

*NEW* Quantification: many to one (0,1 : 0,n)

Further:


*P197 covered parts of *(was partially covered by)
Domain: E93 Presence
Range: E53 Place

Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with an instance of E53 Place that geometrically overlaps with the spatial projection of the respective instance of E93 Presence. A use case of this property is to state through which places an object or an instance of E21 Person has or was moved within a given time-span. It may also be used to describe a partial or complete, temporary or permanent extension of the spatial extent of some realm into a neighboring region during a known time-span. It may also be used to describe a partial or complete, temporary or permanent extension of the spatial extent of some realm into a neighboring region during a known time-span. It is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E93 Presence through /P161 has spatial projection/, E53 Place, /P121 overlaps with/ to E53 Place.

....needs a Quantification:*many to many (0:n,0:n)*

An instance of E53 Presence may cover parts of many places, and places may not be covered by any presence or by many.

One may argue, that the spatial projection of an instance of E93 Presence is a subproperty of P197, if P121 would include identity. I vote against such an interpretation, and for proper "overlaps".

I propose an immediate e-vote to be called for this issue.

Best,

Martin

--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
 Email: [email protected]
 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to