Dear colleagues,
the examples of cataloguing the audiovisual information exist, and an expert
gave it me:
http://www.dapx.org/showservices.asp?ID=1003&fbclid=IwAR1MoBC2u07qVOGw5X3z2nZRjiu64SYAWDt6PQx-qlG8bRmmqkpPlo2srkE
Details: Chinese standard includes 25 positions of metadata (code of archive,
its category, level of invenorisation, unique identifier, file numver, name of
the scan creator, date of digital copying, date of the next
conversion/migration, permission, notes, address of real location, original
носитель, mode of digital copying, copying device, software and OS, name of
file, size of file, format, video parameters, audio paremeters etc.)
Something similar was proposed for the Russian archives.
With kind regards,
Daria Hookk
Senior Researcher of
the dept. of archaeology of
Eastern Europe and Siberia of
the State Hermitage Museum,
PhD, ICOMOS member
E-mail: [email protected]
Skype: daria.hookk
https://hermitage.academia.edu/HookkDaria
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
