YES On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:24 PM Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig < [email protected]> wrote:
> YES > > Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig < > [email protected]>: > > Dear all, > > This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification > documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for > this issue is here: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing > > The proposed template is here: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing > > The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main > change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and > property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without > repeating material and while keeping track of different versions. > > The possible votes are: > > - Yes = accept/agree > - No = do not accept/agree > - Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes, > but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish > to stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification > and reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because > it violates the following principle...') > > Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June. > > All the best, > > Thanasis > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig > > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig >
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
