YES. Have not yet applied it to LRMoo, but it should work. I have a question about the list of external properties: in FRBRoo this list included the domains and ranges in the table. I have found that helpful. Is the format of the table perscriptive?
Pat Pat Riva Associate University Librarian, Collection Services (on leave) Concordia University Vanier Library (VL-301-61) 7141 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 Canada [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig <[email protected]> Sent: June 21, 2021 4:51 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models) YES Le 21.06.21 à 15:47, George Bruseker via Crm-sig a écrit : YES On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:24 PM Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: YES Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: Dear all, This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for this issue is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing The proposed template is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without repeating material and while keeping track of different versions. The possible votes are: * Yes = accept/agree * No = do not accept/agree * Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes, but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish to stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification and reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it violates the following principle...') Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June. All the best, Thanasis _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
