YES
Best,
Gerald

From: Crm-sig <crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Martin Doerr via 
Crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
Reply to: Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr>
Date: Monday, 21. March 2022 at 12:44
To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

TES!

Martin

On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:

Dear all,

As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.

In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – 
CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the 
quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to many-to-many, as 
well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be assigned the 
following AP numbers:

  *   AP29 appears in
  *   AP30 restricted to
  *   AP31 typical for

The new scope notes<https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/294_0.docx> are 
working definitions. The relations among types (issue 
407<http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-407-ordinal-property-for-e55-type>)  be 
taken into account, together with skos and other standards.

HW: SdS to edit them.
The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the 
end of this email:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t



You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses 
which will be a separate e-vote)



YES if you accept the edited texts

NO if you don't accept the edited texts

VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state



The voting is open until 4th April.



Best,

Christian-Emil




294: E55 Type relations
The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier to 
follow the differences.

OLD
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within this 
period. The
generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological 
or other processes.
This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the 
class of object in the
archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological observations: 
If the genesis of an
object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the 
context in which it
was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, 
ceteris paribus,
that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with one 
of the instance of E4
Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ properties.

NEW
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought 
into existence during
this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
biological, geological or other
processes.
This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated 
object kind in the
archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can 
plausibly be assumed to
fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this 
property supports
reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part 
of, or overlaps with,
one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has 
appeared. Such weak
statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological 
observations.
Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 
typical for.

OLD
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been generated 
in this period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the kind 
of object in the
observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be 
assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with 
this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context 
actually forms part of
the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they 
are still in use,
and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and ‘appears in’.

In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z)

NEW
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been generated 
exclusively in this
period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the 
associated object kind in
the observed record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be 
assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with 
this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context 
actually forms part of
the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they 
are still in use,
and objects from later periods may have been displaced into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties AP29 appears in and AP31 typical 
for.

In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z)

OLD
AP31 typical for
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) to an instance
of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated in 
this period in
significantly higher numbers and wider distribution, than in other periods.
This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the 
kind of object in the
observation record: If a sufficient number of objects of this type are found in 
some context, and
their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the find 
context, then the
statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, 
that the genesis period
of the find context is likely to forms part of the related instance of E4 
Period, or at least overlaps
with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this kind in 
the find context is
compatible with the general density this kind of object had in the respective 
period in comparable
contexts and deposition history.
A stronger claim can be made using ‘restricted to’ while a weaker claim is made 
using ‘appears
in&#39;.

NEW
AP31 typical for
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been generated 
in this period in
significantly greater numbers and in wider distributions, than in other periods.
This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the 
associated object
kind in the observed record: If a &quot;sufficient number&quot; of objects of 
this type are found in a context,
and their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the 
find context, then the
statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, 
that the genesis
period of the find context is likely to form part of the related instance of E4 
Period, or at least
overlap with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this 
kind in the find
context is compatible with the general density that this kind of object had 
during the associated
period in contexts of a comparable nature and deposition history.
A stronger claim can be made using AP30 restricted to while a weaker claim 
would use AP29
appears in.






_______________________________________________

Crm-sig mailing list

Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr<mailto:Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>

http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig




--

------------------------------------

 Dr. Martin Doerr



 Honorary Head of the

 Center for Cultural Informatics



 Information Systems Laboratory

 Institute of Computer Science

 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)



 N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,

 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece



 Vox:+30(2810)391625

 Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr>

 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to