Dear all, The result of this e-vote is
8 yes 0 no 0 veto Best, Christian-Emil ________________________________ From: Christian-Emil Smith Ore Sent: 21 March 2022 12:24 To: crm-sig Subject: E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo) Dear all, As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while. In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the quantification of appears in, restricted to, typical for to many-to-many, as well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be assigned the following AP numbers: * AP29 appears in * AP30 restricted to * AP31 typical for The new scope notes<https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/294_0.docx> are working definitions. The relations among types (issue 407<http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-407-ordinal-property-for-e55-type>) be taken into account, together with skos and other standards. HW: SdS to edit them. The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the end of this email: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses which will be a separate e-vote) YES if you accept the edited texts NO if you don't accept the edited texts VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state The voting is open until 4th April. Best, Christian-Emil 294: E55 Type relations The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier to follow the differences. OLD AP29 appears in Domain: E55 Type Range: E4 Period Subproperty: Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an instance of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within this period. The generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological or other processes. This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the class of object in the archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological observations: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with one of the instance of E4 Period in which the respective object type has appeared. Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ properties. NEW AP29 appears in Domain: E55 Type Range: E4 Period Subproperty: Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) with an instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought into existence during this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological or other processes. This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated object kind in the archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this property supports reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part of, or overlaps with, one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has appeared. Such weak statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological observations. Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 typical for. OLD AP30 restricted to Domain: E55 Type Range: E4 Period Subproperty: appears in Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an instance of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been generated in this period. This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the kind of object in the observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context actually forms part of the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it. In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they are still in use, and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context. Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and ‘appears in’. In First Order Logic: […] AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z) NEW AP30 restricted to Domain: E55 Type Range: E4 Period Subproperty: AP29 appears in Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) with an instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been generated exclusively in this period. This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the associated object kind in the observed record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context actually forms part of the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it. In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they are still in use, and objects from later periods may have been displaced into an older context. Weaker claims can be made using the properties AP29 appears in and AP31 typical for. In First Order Logic: […] AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z) OLD AP31 typical for Domain: E55 Type Range: E4 Period Subproperty: AP29 appears in Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) to an instance of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated in this period in significantly higher numbers and wider distribution, than in other periods. This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the kind of object in the observation record: If a sufficient number of objects of this type are found in some context, and their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the find context, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context is likely to forms part of the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this kind in the find context is compatible with the general density this kind of object had in the respective period in comparable contexts and deposition history. A stronger claim can be made using ‘restricted to’ while a weaker claim is made using ‘appears in'. NEW AP31 typical for Domain: E55 Type Range: E4 Period Subproperty: AP29 appears in Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) with an instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been generated in this period in significantly greater numbers and in wider distributions, than in other periods. This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the associated object kind in the observed record: If a "sufficient number" of objects of this type are found in a context, and their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the find context, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context is likely to form part of the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlap with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this kind in the find context is compatible with the general density that this kind of object had during the associated period in contexts of a comparable nature and deposition history. A stronger claim can be made using AP30 restricted to while a weaker claim would use AP29 appears in.
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig