On Monday 22 April 2013 16:28:49 Christopher Covington wrote: > On 04/22/2013 03:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 22 April 2013 14:42:44 Christopher Covington wrote: > >> I'm trying to put together a summary of what distributions have hopped > >> on the Multiarch /lib/<triplet> bandwagon (or plan to), and for those > >> who haven't, what their solution is to dealing with various instruction > >> sets, system call interfaces, application binary interfaces, etc. on a > >> single root filesystem. > > > > Gentoo plans on following standard multilib behavior (what gcc/glibc use) > > > > based on the paths before, it looks like you're really only sampling the > > x86 architecture ? > > I'm mostly interested in ARM and x86, but curious about other architectures > too, if they're handled differently. My thinking as that those who have > 32-bit ARM support but don't yet have aarch64/arm64 support might adopt > the same style their x86 support is already using, should they find ARM's > 64-bit ISA sufficiently interesting.
for Gentoo, we are not going to do reshuffling for aarch64. /lib holds the ARM 32bit libs and /lib64 will hold the aarch64 libs. it'll be this way regardless of host kernel and default ABI. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
