Hi Christopher, You are correct about Fedora. Fedora will likely never go "multi-arch" (although I personally find it interesting, it is seen as exotic and disfavored by most folks I speak with in the Fedora community). We have ensured AArch64 library paths are unified with other RPM distros. On LSB, I spoke with folks about LSB in SF last week. Will followup on AArch64 LSB.
Sent from a plane. Buffered until landing. Jon. -- Sent from my iPad On Apr 22, 2013, at 11:42, Christopher Covington <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to put together a summary of what distributions have hopped on the > Multiarch /lib/<triplet> bandwagon (or plan to), and for those who haven't, > what their solution is to dealing with various instruction sets, system call > interfaces, application binary interfaces, etc. on a single root filesystem. > > Here's what I've gathered so far. Links to up-to-date documentation on the > subject, and any corrections or additions to my little list would be greatly > appreciated. > > Ubuntu, Debian > Multiarch: /lib/<triplet> > > Fedora, OpenSUSE > Multilib A: /lib, /lib64 > > Arch > Multilib B: /lib32, /lib > > Gentoo > Multilib C: /lib32, /lib64, /libx32 > > OpenEmbedded > Uniarch A: /lib > > Android: > Uniarch B: /system/lib > > Also, any news on related LSB/FHS or other standardization efforts? > > Thanks, > Christopher > > -- > Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by the Linux Foundation. > > _______________________________________________ > cross-distro mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro > _______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
